Marriage of McNutt v. McNutt
Decided June 27, 2002. Philip L. Hall wrote the opinion for the court.
49 P.3d 300 · Cited 57 times
Official text
Read the full opinion (CourtListener)
We don’t host opinion text or publish a summary of this ruling — read the official public-domain text for the court’s holding and reasoning, and verify against the primary source.
Precedents cited
Decisions in our collection this opinion relies on, ordered by how often it cites each. Cases we publish link through; others open the full text.
- Marriage of Little v. Little · 975 P.2d 108
- Mead v. Holzmann · 8 P.3d 407
- In Re Marriage of Simpson · 841 P.2d 931
- Kelsey v. Kelsey · 918 P.2d 1067
- Lincoln v. Lincoln · 746 P.2d 13
- Burnette v. Bender · 908 P.2d 1086
- Schenek v. Schenek · 780 P.2d 413
- Jensen v. Bowcut · 892 P.2d 1053
Cited by
Later opinions in our collection that cite this decision.
- Haselrig v. Haselrig · 840 A.2d 338
- Engel v. Landman · 212 P.3d 842
- Pullen v. Pullen · 222 P.3d 909
- Valento v. Valento · 240 P.3d 1239
- Sherman v. Sherman · 241 Ariz. 110
- Milinovich v. Womack · 236 Ariz. 612
- In Re Marriage of Gibbs · 258 P.3d 221
- Nash v. Nash · 232 Ariz. 473
- Strait v. Strait · 224 P.3d 997
- People v. Munoz · 240 P.3d 311
- Lundy v. Lundy · 242 Ariz. 198
- Beasterfield v. Del Bosque
- Ford v. Erickson
Explore from here
Philip L. Hall’s Judicial Record · Ariz. Ct. App. · How we source opinions
Source: opinion metadata, authorship, and citation counts from the Free Law Project’s CourtListener bulk data (public domain). Data last verified 2026-07-09. Informational only; verify against the primary source before relying. Not a consumer report (FCRA).