U.S. District Court / D. Maryland

Maryland Ex Rel. Sachs v. Mid-Atlantic Toyota Distributors, Inc.

Decided May 27, 1983. Joseph H. Young wrote the opinion for the court.

564 F. Supp. 1379 · Cited 51 times

Official text

We don’t host opinion text or publish a summary of this ruling — read the official public-domain text for the court’s holding and reasoning, and verify against the primary source.

Precedents cited

Decisions in our collection this opinion relies on, ordered by how often it cites each. Cases we publish link through; others open the full text.

Maryland Ex Rel. Sachs v. Mid-Atlantic Toyota Distributors, Inc. · 560 F. Supp. 760
Texas Industries, Inc. v. Radcliff Materials, Inc. · 451 U.S. 630
Brady v. United States · 397 U.S. 742

Cited by

Later opinions in our collection that cite this decision.

In Re Mid-Atlantic Toyota Antitrust Litigation · 585 F. Supp. 1553
State Ex Rel. Sachs v. Mid-Atlantic Toyota Distributors, Inc. · 605 F. Supp. 440
Pollard v. Alpha Technical · 102 So. 3d 71
Horton v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. · 855 F. Supp. 825
State Ex Rel. Byrd v. Chadwick · 956 S.W.2d 369
Linton v. Consumer Protection Division · 225 A.3d 456
Buchet v. ITT Consumer Financial Corp. · 845 F. Supp. 684
Ex Parte First Nat. Bank of Jasper · 717 So. 2d 342
In Re Linerboard Antitrust Litigation · 292 F. Supp. 2d 631
Midland Mutual Life Insurance v. Sellers · 101 B.R. 921
In Re Microsoft Corp. Antitrust Litigation · 185 F. Supp. 2d 519

Explore from here

Joseph H. Young’s Judicial Record · D. Maryland · How we source opinions

Source: opinion metadata, authorship, and citation counts from the Free Law Project’s CourtListener bulk data (public domain). Data last verified 2026-07-09. Informational only; verify against the primary source before relying. Not a consumer report (FCRA).