Matter of Application of Miller
Decided May 27, 1912. Lucien Shaw wrote the opinion for the court.
124 P. 427 · Cited 94 times
Official text
Read the full opinion (CourtListener)
We don’t host opinion text or publish a summary of this ruling — read the official public-domain text for the court’s holding and reasoning, and verify against the primary source.
Precedents cited
Decisions in our collection this opinion relies on, ordered by how often it cites each. Cases we publish link through; others open the full text.
- Holden v. Hardy · 169 U.S. 366
- Matter of Application of Martin · 106 P. 235
- City of Pasadena v. Stimson · 91 Cal. 238
- Ritchie v. People · 155 Ill. 98
- Ex parte Jentzsch · 112 Cal. 468
- Ex Parte Sohncke · 82 P. 956
- In Re Spencer · 86 P. 896
- Stockton v. Common Council of Stockton · 41 Cal. 147
- Ex Parte King · 106 P. 578
- W. C. Ritchie & Co. v. Wayman · 244 Ill. 509
- Krause v. Durbrow · 60 P. 438
- Matter of Application of Martin · 106 P. 239
- Muller v. Oregon · 208 U.S. 412
- Marsh v. Hanly · 111 Cal. 368
- Ex parte Giambonini · 117 Cal. 573
Cited by
Later opinions in our collection that cite this decision.
- Ratkovich v. City of San Bruno · 245 Cal. App. 2d 870
- Professional Engineers v. Department of Transportation · 15 Cal. 4th 543
- California Grape & Tree Fruit League v. Industrial Welfare Commission · 268 Cal. App. 2d 692
- Pritchard v. Whitney Estate Co. · 129 P. 989
- Sacramento & San Joaquin Drainage District v. Rector · 156 P. 506
- West Coast Theatres, Inc. v. City of Pomona · 230 P. 225
- Mordecai v. Board of Supervisors of County of Madera · 192 P. 40
- Mengelkoch v. Industrial Welfare Commission · 284 F. Supp. 956
- Cal. Drive-In Restaurant Assn. v. Clark · 22 Cal. 2d 287
- Western Indemnity Co. v. Pillsbury · 151 P. 398
- Lockard v. City of Los Angeles · 33 Cal. 2d 453
- In Re Porterfield · 28 Cal. 2d 91
- Perez v. Sharp · 32 Cal. 2d 711
- People v. Western Fruit Growers · 22 Cal. 2d 494
- Lelande v. Lowery · 26 Cal. 2d 224
- Natural Milk Producers Ass'n v. City & County of San Francisco · 20 Cal. 2d 101
- Ivanhoe Irrigation District v. All Parties & Persons · 306 P.2d 824
- Bacon Service Corporation v. Huss. · 248 P. 235
- Rivera v. Division of Industrial Welfare · 265 Cal. App. 2d 576
- Jardine v. City of Pasadena · 248 P. 225
- Abbey Land & Improvement Co. v. County of San Mateo · 139 P. 1068
- In Re Maki · 56 Cal. App. 2d 635
- Ferrante v. Fish & Game Commission · 29 Cal. 2d 365
- Redlands Foothill Groves v. Jacobs · 30 F. Supp. 995
- Haviland v. Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc. · 67 Cal. App. 2d 225
Explore from here
Lucien Shaw’s Judicial Record · Cal. · How we source opinions
Source: opinion metadata, authorship, and citation counts from the Free Law Project’s CourtListener bulk data (public domain). Data last verified 2026-07-09. Informational only; verify against the primary source before relying. Not a consumer report (FCRA).