Meyer v. Blackman

Decided May 29, 1963. Paul Peek wrote the opinion for the court.

381 P.2d 916 · Cited 56 times

Official text

Read the full opinion (CourtListener)

We don’t host opinion text or publish a summary of this ruling — read the official public-domain text for the court’s holding and reasoning, and verify against the primary source.

Precedents cited

Decisions in our collection this opinion relies on, ordered by how often it cites each. Cases we publish link through; others open the full text.

• Goncalves v. Los Banos Mining Co. · 58 Cal. 2d 916
• Fuller v. Chambers · 169 Cal. App. 2d 602
• Bristow v. Brinson · 212 Cal. App. 2d 168
• Kuharski v. Somers Motor Lines, Inc. · 43 A.2d 777
• Biakanja v. Irving · 49 Cal. 2d 647
• Estate of Lances · 14 P.2d 768
• Sabella v. Wisler · 377 P.2d 889
• Blank v. Coffin · 20 Cal. 2d 457
• Emery v. Emery · 45 Cal. 2d 421
• Loper v. Morrison · 23 Cal. 2d 600
• Scott v. Burke · 39 Cal. 2d 388
• Engstrom v. Auburn Automobile Sales Corp. · 11 Cal. 2d 64
• Raber v. Tumin · 36 Cal. 2d 654
• Johnson v. Monson · 190 P. 635
• Cain v. Marquez · 31 Cal. App. 2d 430
• Kakluskas v. Somers Motor Lines, Inc. · 54 A.2d 592
• Hallman v. Richards · 266 P.2d 812
• Lovett v. Hitchcock · 192 Cal. App. 2d 806
• Jones v. Ayers · 212 Cal. App. 2d 646
• Harlow v. Van Dusen · 290 P.2d 911
• Anderson v. Newkirch · 101 Cal. App. 2d 171
• Jewel Tea Co. v. Sklivis · 165 So. 824
• Harper v. Griffin Lumber Co. · 34 So. 2d 148
• Palmer v. Agid · 171 Cal. App. 2d 271
• Barell Food Stores, Inc. v. Bennett · 153 P.2d 106

Cited by

Later opinions in our collection that cite this decision.

• Perez v. Van Groningen & Sons, Inc. · 719 P.2d 676
• Ferreyra v. E. & J. GALLO WINERY · 231 Cal. App. 2d 426
• Smith v. Lockheed Propulsion Co. · 247 Cal. App. 2d 774
• Morgan v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co. · 37 Cal. App. 3d 1006
• Trejo v. MacIel · 239 Cal. App. 2d 487
• Fraser v. Sprague · 270 Cal. App. 2d 736
• Palazzi v. Air Cargo Terminals, Inc. · 244 Cal. App. 2d 190
• Chappell v. Palmer · 236 Cal. App. 2d 34
• Reisch v. M & D TERMINALS, INC. · 884 P.2d 242
• Palazzi v. Air Cargo Terminals, Inc. · 244 Cal. App. 2d 190
• Mary M. v. City of Los Angeles · 814 P.2d 1341
• Hinman v. Westinghouse Electric Co. · 471 P.2d 988
• Calvillo-Silva v. Home Grocery · 968 P.2d 65
• Saala v. McFarland · 403 P.2d 400
• Kopfinger v. Grand Central Public Market · 60 Cal. 2d 852
• Garcia v. Joseph Vince Co. · 84 Cal. App. 3d 868
• Reuther v. Viall · 62 Cal. 2d 470
• Pelletti v. Membrila · 234 Cal. App. 2d 606
• Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. v. Department of Transportation · 220 Cal. App. 4th 87
• Hart v. Wielt · 4 Cal. App. 3d 224
• Durham v. City of Los Angeles · 91 Cal. App. 3d 567
• McDonald v. City of Oakland · 233 Cal. App. 2d 672
• Estate of Straisinger · 247 Cal. App. 2d 574
• People v. Benson · 210 Cal. App. 3d 1223
• Mangrum v. Union Pacific Railroad · 230 Cal. App. 2d 960

Explore from here

Paul Peek’s Judicial Record · Cal. · How we source opinions

Source: opinion metadata, authorship, and citation counts from the Free Law Project’s CourtListener bulk data (public domain). Data last verified 2026-07-09. Informational only; verify against the primary source before relying. Not a consumer report (FCRA).