State Court of Appeals / Cal. Ct. App.

Mocek v. Alfa Leisure, Inc.

Decided December 15, 2003. William F. Rylaarsdam wrote the opinion for the court.

7 Cal. Rptr. 3d 546 · Cited 82 times

Official text

We don’t host opinion text or publish a summary of this ruling — read the official public-domain text for the court’s holding and reasoning, and verify against the primary source.

Precedents cited

Decisions in our collection this opinion relies on, ordered by how often it cites each. Cases we publish link through; others open the full text.

Music Acceptance Corp. v. Lofing · 32 Cal. App. 4th 610
American Suzuki Motor Corp. v. Superior Court · 37 Cal. App. 4th 1291
Krieger v. Nick Alexander Imports, Inc. · 234 Cal. App. 3d 205
Young v. Gannon · 118 Cal. Rptr. 2d 187
Krotin v. Porsche Cars North America, Inc. · 38 Cal. App. 4th 294
Souza v. Lauppe · 59 Cal. App. 4th 865
Williams v. Superior Court · 111 Cal. Rptr. 2d 918
Estate of Messner · 190 Cal. App. 3d 818

Cited by

Later opinions in our collection that cite this decision.

Brand v. Hyundai Motor America · 226 Cal. App. 4th 1538
Mexia v. Rinker Boat Co., Inc. · 174 Cal. App. 4th 1297
Cholakyan v. MERCEDES-BENZ USA, LLC · 796 F. Supp. 2d 1220
Isip v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC · 65 Cal. Rptr. 3d 695
Lafferty v. Wells Fargo Bank · 213 Cal. App. 4th 545
Kowalsky v. Hewlett-Packard Co. · 771 F. Supp. 2d 1138
Pierce v. Western Surety Co. · 207 Cal. App. 4th 83
Brooks v. Carmax Auto Superstores Cal., LLC · 201 Cal. Rptr. 3d 138

Explore from here

William F. Rylaarsdam’s Judicial Record · Cal. Ct. App. · How we source opinions

Source: opinion metadata, authorship, and citation counts from the Free Law Project’s CourtListener bulk data (public domain). Data last verified 2026-07-09. Informational only; verify against the primary source before relying. Not a consumer report (FCRA).