North Coast Rivers Alliance v. Marin Municipal Water District Board of Directors

Decided May 21, 2013. Timothy A. Reardon wrote the opinion for the court.

216 Cal. App. 4th 614 · Cited 76 times

Authorship attributed by a unique court + date + surname match against our roster (CourtListener recorded no author id for this opinion); verify against the official text. How we match.

Official text

Read the full opinion (CourtListener)

We don’t host opinion text or publish a summary of this ruling — read the official public-domain text for the court’s holding and reasoning, and verify against the primary source.

Precedents cited

Decisions in our collection this opinion relies on, ordered by how often it cites each. Cases we publish link through; others open the full text.

• California Native Plant Society v. City of Rancho Cordova · 172 Cal. App. 4th 603
• Clover Valley Foundation v. City of Rocklin · 197 Cal. App. 4th 200
• Endangered Habitats League, Inc. v. County of Orange · 32 Cal. Rptr. 3d 177
• City of Long Beach v. Los Angeles Unified School District · 176 Cal. App. 4th 889
• Sierra Club v. City of Orange · 163 Cal. App. 4th 523
• ASS'N OF IRRITATED RESIDENTS v. County of Madera · 133 Cal. Rptr. 2d 718
• Oakland Heritage Alliance v. City of Oakland · 195 Cal. App. 4th 884
• Bowman v. City of Berkeley · 18 Cal. Rptr. 3d 814
• Evans v. City of San Jose · 27 Cal. Rptr. 3d 675
• Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n of San Francisco, Inc. v. Regents of University of California · 864 P.2d 502
• Marin Municipal Water District v. KG Land California Corp. · 235 Cal. App. 3d 1652
• Ocean View Estates Homeowners Ass'n v. Montecito Water District · 10 Cal. Rptr. 3d 451
• Sonoma County Water Coalition v. Sonoma County Water Agency · 189 Cal. App. 4th 33
• Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n of San Francisco, Inc. v. Regents of University of California · 764 P.2d 278
• Vineyard Area Citizens for Responsible Growth, Inc. v. City of Rancho Cordova · 150 P.3d 709
• Citizens of Goleta Valley v. Board of Supervisors · 801 P.2d 1161
• Eureka Citizens for Responsible Government v. City of Eureka · 54 Cal. Rptr. 3d 485
• Sequoyah Hills Homeowners Ass'n v. City of Oakland · 23 Cal. App. 4th 704
• The Pocket Protectors v. City of Sacramento · 21 Cal. Rptr. 3d 791
• Ballona Wetlands Land Trust v. City of Los Angeles · 201 Cal. App. 4th 455
• Citizens for East Shore Parks v. State Lands Commission · 202 Cal. App. 4th 549
• Save Round Valley Alliance v. County of Inyo · 70 Cal. Rptr. 3d 59
• Ebbetts Pass Forest Watch v. California Department of Forestry & Fire Protection · 43 Cal. 4th 936
• Citizens for Responsible Equitable Environment Development v. City of San Diego · 196 Cal. App. 4th 515
• Gentry v. City of Murrieta · 36 Cal. App. 4th 1359

Cited by

Later opinions in our collection that cite this decision.

• Protect Niles v. City of Fremont · 236 Cal. Rptr. 3d 513
• Center for Biological Diversity v. Cal. Dept. of Forestry and Fire Protection CA1/5 · 232 Cal. App. 4th 931
• Center for Biological Diversity v. Department of Fish & Wildlife · 62 Cal. 4th 204
• South of Mkt. Cmty. Action Network v. City and County of San Francisco · 245 Cal. Rptr. 3d 174
• Banning Ranch Conservancy v. City of Newport Beach · 216 Cal. Rptr. 3d 306
• North Coast Rivers Alliance v. Westlands Water District · 227 Cal. App. 4th 832
• High Sierra Rural Alliance v. Cnty. of Plumas · 239 Cal. Rptr. 3d 874
• Lotus v. Department of Transportation · 223 Cal. App. 4th 645
• Center for Biological Diversity v. County of San Bernardino · 247 Cal. App. 4th 326
• Soc'y v. Cnty. of El Dorado · 241 Cal. Rptr. 3d 421
• City of Long Beach v. City of L. A. · 228 Cal. Rptr. 3d 23
• Bay Area Citizens v. Association of Bay Area Governments · 248 Cal. App. 4th 966
• McCorkle Eastside Neighborhood Grp. v. City of St. Helena · 242 Cal. Rptr. 3d 379

Explore from here

Timothy A. Reardon’s Judicial Record · Cal. Ct. App. · How we source opinions

Source: opinion metadata, authorship, and citation counts from the Free Law Project’s CourtListener bulk data (public domain). Data last verified 2026-07-09. Informational only; verify against the primary source before relying. Not a consumer report (FCRA).