Pacific Telephone Etc. Co. v. Eshleman
Decided December 20, 1913. M. C. Sloss wrote the opinion for the court.
137 P. 1119 · Cited 150 times
Official text
Read the full opinion (CourtListener)
We don’t host opinion text or publish a summary of this ruling — read the official public-domain text for the court’s holding and reasoning, and verify against the primary source.
Precedents cited
Decisions in our collection this opinion relies on, ordered by how often it cites each. Cases we publish link through; others open the full text.
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Union Pacific Railroad · 222 U.S. 541
- Quinchard v. Board of Trustees · 113 Cal. 664
- Spring Valley Water Works v. Bryant · 52 Cal. 132
- Barron Ex Rel. Tiernan v. Mayor of Baltimore · 32 U.S. 243
- Wisconsin, Minnesota & Pacific Railroad v. Jacobson · 179 U.S. 287
- Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. Nebraska · 164 U.S. 403
- In Re Duncan · 139 U.S. 449
- Ex parte Jentzsch · 112 Cal. 468
- Imperial Water Co. v. Board of Supervisors · 120 P. 780
- Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. Nebraska · 217 U.S. 196
- Chinn v. Superior Court of San Joaquin Cty. · 105 P. 580
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Railroad Commission · 171 Ind. 189
- Cook v. City of Butler · 172 Ind. 720
- Cook v. Civil Service Commission · 117 P. 663
- Robinson v. Bd. of Supervisors of Sacramento · 16 Cal. 208
- Central Pacific Railroad v. Board of Equalization · 43 Cal. 365
- Hicks v. Bell · 3 Cal. 219
- Zander v. Coe · 5 Cal. 230
- Caulfield v. Hudson · 3 Cal. 389
- Thompson v. Williams · 6 Cal. 88
- Central Pacific Railroad v. Board of Equalization of Placer County · 46 Cal. 667
- Junction Creek & North Durango Domestic & Irrigating Ditch Co. v. City of Durango · 21 Colo. 194
Cited by
Later opinions in our collection that cite this decision.
- Gerawan Farming, Inc. v. Agricultural Labor Relations Board · 247 Cal. App. 4th 284
- County of Sonoma v. State Energy Resources Conservation & Development Commission · 708 P.2d 693
- Powers v. City of Richmond · 893 P.2d 1160
- East Bay Municipal Utility District v. Railroad Commission · 229 P. 949
- Modern Barber Colleges, Inc. v. California Employment Stabilization Commission · 31 Cal. 2d 720
- Candlestick Properties, Inc. v. San Francisco Bay Conservation & Development Commission · 11 Cal. App. 3d 557
- Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Public Utilities Commission · 215 P.2d 441
- Southern Pacific Co. v. Railroad Commission · 13 Cal. 2d 89
- Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. Public Utilities Commission · 68 Cal. 2d 406
- Pacific Tel. & Tel. Co. v. Public Utilities Com. · 34 Cal. 2d 822
- Port of New York Authority v. Heming · 167 A.2d 609
- Peacock v. County of Sacramento · 271 Cal. App. 2d 845
- Miller & Lux, Inc. v. Board of Supervisors · 208 P. 304
- Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control v. Superior Court · 268 Cal. App. 2d 67
- Independent Laundry v. Railroad Com. · 70 Cal. App. 2d 816
- People v. Western Air Lines, Inc. · 268 P.2d 723
- Ayres v. City Council of Los Angeles · 34 Cal. 2d 31
- Frustuck v. City of Fairfax · 212 Cal. App. 2d 345
- Southern California Jockey Club, Inc. v. California Horse Racing Board · 223 P.2d 1
- House v. Los Angeles County Flood Control District · 25 Cal. 2d 384
- Sandstrom v. California Horse Racing Board · 31 Cal. 2d 401
- Del Mar Water, Light & Power Co. v. Eshleman · 140 P. 591
- Ivanhoe Irrigation District v. All Parties & Persons · 306 P.2d 824
- Loustalot v. Superior Court · 30 Cal. 2d 905
- Hilltop Properties, Inc. v. State · 233 Cal. App. 2d 349
Explore from here
M. C. Sloss’s Judicial Record · Cal. · How we source opinions
Source: opinion metadata, authorship, and citation counts from the Free Law Project’s CourtListener bulk data (public domain). Data last verified 2026-07-09. Informational only; verify against the primary source before relying. Not a consumer report (FCRA).