Paiva v. Nichols

Decided November 26, 2008. Wendy Clark Duffy wrote the opinion for the court.

168 Cal. App. 4th 1007 · Cited 93 times

Authorship attributed by a unique court + date + surname match against our roster (CourtListener recorded no author id for this opinion); verify against the official text. How we match.

Official text

Read the full opinion (CourtListener)

We don’t host opinion text or publish a summary of this ruling — read the official public-domain text for the court’s holding and reasoning, and verify against the primary source.

Precedents cited

Decisions in our collection this opinion relies on, ordered by how often it cites each. Cases we publish link through; others open the full text.

• Zamos v. Stroud · 87 P.3d 802
• Fleishman v. Superior Court · 125 Cal. Rptr. 2d 383
• Bello v. ABA Energy Corp. · 16 Cal. Rptr. 3d 818
• Wilson v. Parker, Covert & Chidester · 50 P.3d 733
• Sheldon Appel Co. v. Albert & Oliker · 765 P.2d 498
• Jarrow Formulas, Inc. v. LaMarche · 74 P.3d 737
• Navellier v. Sletten · 52 P.3d 703
• In Re Marriage of Flaherty · 646 P.2d 179
• Ketchum v. Moses · 17 P.3d 735
• Equilon Enterprises v. Consumer Cause, Inc. · 52 P.3d 685
• Briggs v. Eden Council for Hope & Opportunity · 969 P.2d 564
• Soukup v. Law Offices of Herbert Hafif · 139 P.3d 30
• Rusheen v. Cohen · 128 P.3d 713
• Moradi-Shalal v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Companies · 758 P.2d 58
• Bertero v. National General Corp. · 529 P.2d 608
• Varian Medical Systems, Inc. v. Delfino · 106 P.3d 958
• ComputerXpress, Inc. v. Jackson · 113 Cal. Rptr. 2d 625
• Royal Globe Insurance v. Superior Court · 592 P.2d 329
• Continental Baking Co. v. Katz · 68 Cal. 2d 512
• Casa Herrera, Inc. v. Beydoun · 83 P.3d 497
• Marijanovic v. Gray, York & Duffy · 40 Cal. Rptr. 3d 867
• City of Cotati v. Cashman · 52 P.3d 695
• Benach v. County of Los Angeles · 57 Cal. Rptr. 3d 363
• Church of Scientology v. Wollersheim · 42 Cal. App. 4th 628
• HMS Capital, Inc. v. Lawyers Title Co. · 12 Cal. Rptr. 3d 786

Cited by

Later opinions in our collection that cite this decision.

• Franklin Mint Co. v. Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP · 184 Cal. App. 4th 313
• ANTOUNIAN v. Louis Vuitton Malletier · 189 Cal. App. 4th 438
• Oviedo v. Windsor Twelve Properties, LLC · 212 Cal. App. 4th 97
• Drummond v. Desmarais · 176 Cal. App. 4th 439
• Monster Energy Company v. Schechter · 249 Cal. Rptr. 3d 295
• Sweetwater Union High Sch. Dist. v. Gilbane Bldg. Co. · 243 Cal. Rptr. 3d 880
• Hecimovich v. Encinal School Parent Teacher Organization · 203 Cal. App. 4th 450
• City of Costa Mesa v. D'Alessio Investments · 214 Cal. App. 4th 358
• Summit Bank v. Rogers · 206 Cal. App. 4th 669
• Thayer v. Kabateck Brown Kellner LLP · 207 Cal. App. 4th 141
• Roman v. Bre Properties, Inc. · 237 Cal. App. 4th 1040
• San Diegans for Open Gov't v. San Diego State Univ. Research Found. · 218 Cal. Rptr. 3d 160
• Cross v. Facebook, Inc. · 222 Cal. Rptr. 3d 250
• Hewlett-Packard Co. v. Oracle Corp. · 239 Cal. App. 4th 1174
• Kurz v. Syrus Systems, LLC · 221 Cal. App. 4th 748
• Barker v. Fox & Associates · 240 Cal. App. 4th 333
• Brodeur v. Atlas Entertainment CA2/8 · 248 Cal. App. 4th 665
• Daniel v. Wayans · 8 Cal. App. 5th 367
• Sweetwater Union Sch. Dist. v. Gilbane Bldg. Co. · 199 Cal. Rptr. 3d 659
• Squires v. City of Eureka CA/2 · 231 Cal. App. 4th 577

Explore from here

Wendy Clark Duffy’s Judicial Record · Cal. Ct. App. · How we source opinions

Source: opinion metadata, authorship, and citation counts from the Free Law Project’s CourtListener bulk data (public domain). Data last verified 2026-07-09. Informational only; verify against the primary source before relying. Not a consumer report (FCRA).