Paul for Council v. Hanyecz
Decided January 5, 2001. H Walter Croskey wrote the opinion for the court.
102 Cal. Rptr. 2d 864 · Cited 100 times
Official text
Read the full opinion (CourtListener)
We don’t host opinion text or publish a summary of this ruling — read the official public-domain text for the court’s holding and reasoning, and verify against the primary source.
Precedents cited
Decisions in our collection this opinion relies on, ordered by how often it cites each. Cases we publish link through; others open the full text.
- Wilcox v. Superior Court · 27 Cal. App. 4th 809
- Briggs v. Eden Council for Hope & Opportunity · 969 P.2d 564
- Blank v. Kirwan · 703 P.2d 58
- Church of Scientology v. Wollersheim · 42 Cal. App. 4th 628
- DuPont Merck Pharmaceutical Co. v. Superior Court · 92 Cal. Rptr. 2d 755
- Ryder v. United States · 515 U.S. 177
- Lafayette Morehouse, Inc. v. Chronicle Publishing Co. · 37 Cal. App. 4th 855
- Cloud v. Northrop Grumman Corp. · 79 Cal. Rptr. 2d 544
- Hong Liu v. Moore · 81 Cal. Rptr. 2d 807
- Lafayette Morehouse, Inc. v. Chronicle Publishing Co. · 39 Cal. App. 4th 1379
- Gantman v. United Pacific Insurance Co. · 232 Cal. App. 3d 1560
- Dixon v. Superior Court · 30 Cal. App. 4th 733
Cited by
Later opinions in our collection that cite this decision.
- Flatley v. Mauro · 139 P.3d 2
- Sweetwater Union Sch. Dist. v. Gilbane Bldg. Co. · 199 Cal. Rptr. 3d 659
- Governor Gray Davis Committee v. American Taxpayers Alliance · 125 Cal. Rptr. 2d 534
- Stroock & Stroock & Lavan v. Tendler · 125 Cal. Rptr. 2d 694
- City of Los Angeles v. Animal Defense League · 37 Cal. Rptr. 3d 632
- Kashian v. Harriman · 120 Cal. Rptr. 2d 576
- G.R. v. Intelligator · 185 Cal. App. 4th 606
- Stroock & Stroock & Lavan v. Tendler · 121 Cal. Rptr. 2d 14
- Cabral v. Martins · 177 Cal. App. 4th 471
- Chavez v. Mendoza · 114 Cal. Rptr. 2d 825
- Bulletin Displays, LLC v. Regency Outdoor Advertising, Inc. · 448 F. Supp. 2d 1172
- Kajima Engineering & Construction, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles · 116 Cal. Rptr. 2d 187
- Fremont Reorganizing Corp. v. Faigin · 198 Cal. App. 4th 1153
- Navellier v. Sletten · 52 P.3d 703
- Equilon Enterprises v. Consumer Cause, Inc. · 52 P.3d 685
- Soukup v. Law Offices of Herbert Hafif · 139 P.3d 30
- Birkner v. Lam · 67 Cal. Rptr. 3d 190
- Paul v. Friedman · 117 Cal. Rptr. 2d 82
- Lam v. Ngo · 111 Cal. Rptr. 2d 582
- Cross v. Cooper · 197 Cal. App. 4th 357
- 1-800 CONTACTS, INC. v. Steinberg · 132 Cal. Rptr. 2d 789
- Bergstein v. Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP · 236 Cal. App. 4th 793
- Mattel, Inc. v. Luce, Forward, Hamilton & Scripps · 121 Cal. Rptr. 2d 794
- Birkner v. Lam · 156 Cal. App. 4th 275
- Wilson v. Parker, Covert & Chidester · 50 P.3d 733
Explore from here
H Walter Croskey’s Judicial Record · Cal. Ct. App. · How we source opinions
Source: opinion metadata, authorship, and citation counts from the Free Law Project’s CourtListener bulk data (public domain). Data last verified 2026-07-09. Informational only; verify against the primary source before relying. Not a consumer report (FCRA).