State Supreme Court / Cal.

People v. Tinder & Smith

Decided July 1, 1862. Stephen Johnson Field wrote the opinion for the court.

19 Cal. 539 · Cited 59 times

Authorship attributed by a unique court + date + surname match against our roster (CourtListener recorded no author id for this opinion); verify against the official text. How we match.

Precedents cited (1) ↓Cited by (18) ↓

Official text

Read the full opinion (CourtListener)

We don’t host opinion text or publish a summary of this ruling — read the official public-domain text for the court’s holding and reasoning, and verify against the primary source.

Precedents cited

Decisions in our collection this opinion relies on, ordered by how often it cites each. Cases we publish link through; others open the full text.

Lumm v. State · 3 Ind. 293

Cited by

Later opinions in our collection that cite this decision.

Cummiskey v. Superior Court · 839 P.2d 1059
State v. Teeter · 200 P.2d 657
Clark v. Superior Court · 11 Cal. App. 4th 455
Lorenson v. Superior Court · 35 Cal. 2d 49
Greenberg v. Superior Court · 19 Cal. 2d 319
Ex parte Brown · 68 Cal. 176
In Re Kennedy · 78 P. 34
Daily Journal Corp. v. Superior Court · 979 P.2d 982
Brown v. State · 147 Ind. 28
Taglianetti v. Fontaine · 253 A.2d 609
State v. Second Judicial District Court · 86 Nev. 531
State v. Neisler · 633 So. 2d 1224
In Re Bright · 13 Cal. App. 4th 1664
Goldstein v. Superior Court · 45 Cal. 4th 218
People v. DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR COUNTY OF ADAMS · 529 P.2d 1335
Cereghino v. Superior Court · 177 Cal. App. 2d 328
Collins v. State · 118 So. 265
Ex Parte Flowers · 118 So. 462

Explore from here

Stephen Johnson Field’s Judicial Record · Cal. · How we source opinions

Source: opinion metadata, authorship, and citation counts from the Free Law Project’s CourtListener bulk data (public domain). Data last verified 2026-07-09. Informational only; verify against the primary source before relying. Not a consumer report (FCRA).