State Court of Appeals / Cal. Ct. App.

Redevelopment Agency v. Hayes

Decided January 26, 1954. Absalom F. Bray wrote the opinion for the court.

122 Cal. App. 2d 777 · Cited 89 times

Official text

We don’t host opinion text or publish a summary of this ruling — read the official public-domain text for the court’s holding and reasoning, and verify against the primary source.

Precedents cited

Decisions in our collection this opinion relies on, ordered by how often it cites each. Cases we publish link through; others open the full text.

The Housing Authority v. Dockweiler · 14 Cal. 2d 437
Foeller v. Housing Authority of Portland · 256 P.2d 752
Chicago Land Clearance Commission v. White · 104 N.E.2d 236
Belovsky v. Redevelopment Authority · 54 A.2d 277
Kaskel v. Impellitteri · 306 N.Y. 73
People Ex Rel. Gutknecht v. City of Chicago · 111 N.E.2d 626
Fallbrook Irrigation District v. Bradley · 164 U.S. 112
Olsen v. Nebraska Ex Rel. Western Reference & Bond Assn., Inc. · 313 U.S. 236
Zurn v. City of Chicago · 59 N.E.2d 18
Cremer v. Peoria Housing Authority · 78 N.E.2d 276
Nashville Housing Authority v. City of Nashville · 237 S.W.2d 946
Miller v. Board of Public Works of Los Angeles · 234 P. 381
Clark v. Nash · 198 U.S. 361
City of Whittier v. Dixon · 24 Cal. 2d 664
City of Oakland v. Garrison · 228 P. 433
Veterans' Welfare Board v. Jordan · 208 P. 284
In Re Slum Clearance Between Hastings, Gratiot, De Quindre and Mullett Streets · 50 N.W.2d 340
Rowe v. Housing Authority · 249 S.W.2d 551
People Ex Rel. Tuohy v. City of Chicago · 78 N.E.2d 285
Ajootian v. Providence Redevelopment Agency · 91 A.2d 21
United States v. Carolene Products Co. · 304 U.S. 144
City & County of San Francisco v. Boyd · 22 Cal. 2d 685
Wright v. Jordan · 221 P. 915
HOUSING AUTHORITY &C. v. Johnson · 74 S.E.2d 891
Patrick v. Riley · 287 P. 455

Cited by

Later opinions in our collection that cite this decision.

Levin v. Tp. Committee of Tp. of Bridgewater · 274 A.2d 1
Green v. Community Redevelopment Agency · 96 Cal. App. 3d 491
In Re Redevelopment Plan for Bunker Hill v. Goldman · 389 P.2d 538
Annbar Associates v. West Side Redevelopment Corp. · 397 S.W.2d 635
Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Redevelopment Agency · 75 Cal. App. 3d 957
Board of Supervisors v. Dolan · 45 Cal. App. 3d 237
National City Business Ass'n v. City of National City · 146 Cal. App. 3d 1060
Davis v. City of Lubbock · 326 S.W.2d 699
California Housing Finance Agency v. Elliott · 551 P.2d 1193
Sweetwater Valley Civic Assn. v. City of National City · 555 P.2d 1099
Redevelopment Agency v. Rados Bros. · 115 Cal. Rptr. 2d 234
Larsen v. City & County of San Francisco · 152 Cal. App. 2d 355
Redevelopment Agency v. Malaki · 216 Cal. App. 2d 480
Babcock v. Community Redevelopment Agency · 148 Cal. App. 2d 38
Kruger v. Wells Fargo Bank · 521 P.2d 441
Wilson v. City of Long Branch · 142 A.2d 837
Gohld Realty Co. v. City of Hartford · 141 Conn. 135
City of Oakland v. Oakland Raiders · 646 P.2d 835
Redevelopment Commission v. Security National Bank of Greensboro · 114 S.E.2d 688
City & County of San Francisco v. Ross · 44 Cal. 2d 52
City of Menlo Park v. Artino · 151 Cal. App. 2d 261
Boise Redevelopment Agency v. Yick Kong Corp. · 499 P.2d 575
Tribe v. Salt Lake City Corporation · 540 P.2d 499
Alanel Corp. v. Indianapolis Redevelopment Commission · 154 N.E.2d 515
People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. Nahabedian · 171 Cal. App. 2d 302

Explore from here

Absalom F. Bray’s Judicial Record · Cal. Ct. App. · How we source opinions

Source: opinion metadata, authorship, and citation counts from the Free Law Project’s CourtListener bulk data (public domain). Data last verified 2026-07-09. Informational only; verify against the primary source before relying. Not a consumer report (FCRA).