Ruiz v. Hull
Decided April 28, 1998. Frederick J. Martone wrote the opinion for the court.
957 P.2d 984 · Cited 81 times
Official text
Read the full opinion (CourtListener)
We don’t host opinion text or publish a summary of this ruling — read the official public-domain text for the court’s holding and reasoning, and verify against the primary source.
Precedents cited
Decisions in our collection this opinion relies on, ordered by how often it cites each. Cases we publish link through; others open the full text.
- Meyer v. Nebraska · 262 U.S. 390
- Arizonans for Official English v. Arizona · 520 U.S. 43
- Yniguez v. Mofford · 730 F. Supp. 309
- Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc. · 365 U.S. 127
- Gitlow v. New York · 268 U.S. 652
- Connally v. General Construction Co. · 269 U.S. 385
- Hunter v. Underwood · 471 U.S. 222
- Bond v. Floyd · 385 U.S. 116
- Town of Lockport v. Citizens for Community Action at the Local Level, Inc. · 430 U.S. 259
- Kerby v. State Ex Rel. Frohmiller · 157 P.2d 698
- Eastin v. Broomfield · 570 P.2d 744
- Hernandez v. Frohmiller · 204 P.2d 854
- Town of Chino Valley v. City of Prescott · 638 P.2d 1324
- Republic Investment Fund I v. Town of Surprise · 800 P.2d 1251
- State Compensation Fund v. Symington · 848 P.2d 273
- State Ex Rel. Jones v. Lockhart · 265 P.2d 447
- Slayton v. Shumway · 800 P.2d 590
- County of Apache v. Southwest Lumber Mills, Inc. · 376 P.2d 854
- State Ex Rel. Purcell v. Superior Court · 535 P.2d 1299
- State Ex Rel. Nelson v. Jordan · 450 P.2d 383
- Queen Creek Land & Cattle Corp. v. Yavapai County Board of Supervisors · 501 P.2d 391
- Bussanich v. Douglas · 733 P.2d 644
- City of Tempe v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America · 510 P.2d 745
- Marston's Inc. v. Roman Catholic Church of Phoenix · 644 P.2d 244
- Campana v. Arizona State Land Department · 860 P.2d 1341
Cited by
Later opinions in our collection that cite this decision.
- Alaskans for a Common Language, Inc. v. Kritz · 170 P.3d 183
- In Re Initiative Petition No. 366, State Question No. 689 · 2002 OK 21
- Yes on Prop 200 v. Napolitano · 160 P.3d 1216
- Escamilla v. cuello/cabrera · 230 Ariz. 202
- Cole v. Riley · 989 So. 2d 1001
- State v. Cota · 272 P.3d 1027
- McDonald v. Thomas · 12 P.3d 1194
- Mejak v. Granville · 136 P.3d 874
- White Mountain Health Center, Inc. v. Maricopa County · 241 Ariz. 230
- State v. Bonnewell · 2 P.3d 682
- Samsel v. Allstate Insurance · 19 P.3d 621
- State of Arizona v. Rodney Christopher Jones · 440 P.3d 1139
- McDonald v. Thomas · 40 P.3d 819
- American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees v. City of Phoenix · 213 Ariz. 358
- Eller Media Co. v. City of Tucson · 7 P.3d 136
- City of Surprise v. acc/lake Pleasant · 437 P.3d 865
- Yollin v. City of Glendale · 191 P.3d 1040
- Higginbottom v. State · 51 P.3d 972
- Okemo Mountain, Inc. v. Town of Ludlow · 762 A.2d 1219
- Herman v. City of Tucson · 4 P.3d 973
- Logan v. Forever Living Products International, Inc. · 52 P.3d 760
- Arizona Citizens Clean Elections Commission v. Brain · 234 Ariz. 322
- US West Communications, Inc. v. Arizona Corp. Commission · 34 P.3d 351
- State v. Hazlett · 73 P.3d 1258
- Planned Parenthood Arizona, Inc. v. American Ass'n of Pro-Life Obstetricians & Gynecologists · 257 P.3d 181
Explore from here
Frederick J. Martone’s Judicial Record · Ariz. · How we source opinions
Source: opinion metadata, authorship, and citation counts from the Free Law Project’s CourtListener bulk data (public domain). Data last verified 2026-07-09. Informational only; verify against the primary source before relying. Not a consumer report (FCRA).