Smith v. Smith
Decided August 22, 2012. Andrea Lynn Hoch wrote the opinion for the court.
208 Cal. App. 4th 1074 · Cited 91 times
Authorship attributed by a unique court + date + surname match against our roster (CourtListener recorded no author id for this opinion); verify against the official text. How we match.
Official text
Read the full opinion (CourtListener)
We don’t host opinion text or publish a summary of this ruling — read the official public-domain text for the court’s holding and reasoning, and verify against the primary source.
Precedents cited
Decisions in our collection this opinion relies on, ordered by how often it cites each. Cases we publish link through; others open the full text.
- Lester v. Lennane · 101 Cal. Rptr. 2d 86
- Banning v. Newdow · 14 Cal. Rptr. 3d 447
- Griset v. Fair Political Practices Commission · 23 P.3d 43
- In Re Marriage of Skelley · 556 P.2d 297
- Powers v. City of Richmond · 893 P.2d 1160
- In Re Providian Credit Card Cases · 116 Cal. Rptr. 2d 833
- Loeffler v. Medina · 174 Cal. App. 4th 1495
- MERCURY INTERACTIVE CORPORATION v. Klein · 70 Cal. Rptr. 3d 88
- Burkle v. Burkle · 37 Cal. Rptr. 3d 805
- Lafkas v. Lafkas · 153 Cal. App. 4th 1429
- In Re Elijah S. · 24 Cal. Rptr. 3d 16
- In Re Marriage of Davies · 143 Cal. App. 3d 851
- Steen v. Fremont Cemetery Corp. · 9 Cal. App. 4th 1221
- Miles v. Speidel · 211 Cal. App. 3d 879
- Day v. Papadakis · 231 Cal. App. 3d 503
- Samuel v. Stevedoring Services of America · 24 Cal. App. 4th 414
Cited by
Later opinions in our collection that cite this decision.
- MacAluso v. Superior Court · 219 Cal. App. 4th 1042
- Fajota v. Fajota · 230 Cal. App. 4th 1487
- In re Marriage of Rifkin & Carty · 234 Cal. App. 4th 1339
- Silva v. See's Candy Shops, Inc. · 7 Cal. App. 5th 235
- Diaz v. Prof'l Cmty. Mgmt., Inc. · 225 Cal. Rptr. 3d 39
- Christina L. v. Chauncey B. CA1/4 · 229 Cal. App. 4th 731
- Fin. Holding Co. v. Am. Inst. of Certified Tax Coaches, Inc. · 240 Cal. Rptr. 3d 604
Explore from here
Andrea Lynn Hoch’s Judicial Record · Cal. Ct. App. · How we source opinions
Source: opinion metadata, authorship, and citation counts from the Free Law Project’s CourtListener bulk data (public domain). Data last verified 2026-07-09. Informational only; verify against the primary source before relying. Not a consumer report (FCRA).