Stone v. Ritter

Decided November 6, 2006. Randy J. Holland wrote the opinion for the court.

911 A.2d 362 · Cited 398 times

Authorship attributed by a unique court + date + surname match against our roster (CourtListener recorded no author id for this opinion); verify against the official text. How we match.

Official text

Read the full opinion (CourtListener)

We don’t host opinion text or publish a summary of this ruling — read the official public-domain text for the court’s holding and reasoning, and verify against the primary source.

Precedents cited

Decisions in our collection this opinion relies on, ordered by how often it cites each. Cases we publish link through; others open the full text.

• Rales v. Blasband Ex Rel. Easco Hand Tools, Inc. · 634 A.2d 927
• Brehm v. Eisner · 746 A.2d 244
• Graham v. Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Company · 188 A.2d 125
• Aronson v. Lewis · 473 A.2d 805
• Cede & Co. v. Technicolor, Inc. · 634 A.2d 345
• Beam Ex Rel. M. Stewart Living v. Stewart · 845 A.2d 1040
• Pogostin v. Rice · 480 A.2d 619

Cited by

Later opinions in our collection that cite this decision.

• Marchand II v. Barnhill · 212 A.3d 805
• Mann Ex Rel. Estate of LeapSource, Inc. v. GTCR Golder Rauner, LLC · 483 F. Supp. 2d 884
• Connolly v. Gasmire · 257 S.W.3d 831
• Rahbari v. Oros · 732 F. Supp. 2d 367
• In Re Sonus Networks, Inc. · 499 F.3d 47
• In Re ITT Corp. Derivative Litigation · 588 F. Supp. 2d 502
• City of Birmingham Retirement & Relief System v. Good · 177 A.3d 47
• In Re ITT Corp. Derivative Litigation · 653 F. Supp. 2d 453
• Marchand v. Barnhill
• In Re Danaher Corporation Shareholder Derivative Litigation
• Westmoreland County Employee Retirement System v. Parkinson · 727 F.3d 719
• Wood v. Baum · 953 A.2d 136
• In Re Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. Derivative Litigation · 615 F. Supp. 2d 1018
• Mercier Ex Rel. Massey Energy Co. v. Blankenship · 662 F. Supp. 2d 562
• Playford Ex Rel. Colonial BancGroup, Inc. v. Lowder · 635 F. Supp. 2d 1303
• In Re Bear Stearns Companies, Inc. Securities, Derivative, & Erisa Litigation · 763 F. Supp. 2d 423
• In Re Pfizer Inc. Shareholder Derivative Litigation · 722 F. Supp. 2d 453
• Lyondell Chemical Co. v. Ryan · 970 A.2d 235
• Scrushy v. Tucker · 70 So. 3d 289
• Leyte-Vidal v. Semel · 220 Cal. App. 4th 1001
• Carter Ex Rel. CNO Financial Group, Inc. v. Hilliard · 970 N.E.2d 735
• Mukamal v. Bakes · 383 B.R. 798
• Wiley v. Stipes · 595 F. Supp. 2d 179
• MARKEWICH EX REL. MEDTRONIC, INC. v. Collins · 622 F. Supp. 2d 802
• In Re BIDZ.COM, INC. DERIVATIVE LITIGATION · 773 F. Supp. 2d 844

Explore from here

Randy J. Holland’s Judicial Record · Del. · How we source opinions

Source: opinion metadata, authorship, and citation counts from the Free Law Project’s CourtListener bulk data (public domain). Data last verified 2026-07-09. Informational only; verify against the primary source before relying. Not a consumer report (FCRA).