United States v. Ozsusamlar
Decided April 18, 2006. Peter Keeton Leisure wrote the opinion for the court.
428 F. Supp. 2d 161 · Cited 60 times
Official text
Read the full opinion (CourtListener)
We don’t host opinion text or publish a summary of this ruling — read the official public-domain text for the court’s holding and reasoning, and verify against the primary source.
Precedents cited
Decisions in our collection this opinion relies on, ordered by how often it cites each. Cases we publish link through; others open the full text.
- Huddleston v. United States · 485 U.S. 681
- National Union Fire Insurance v. L.E. Myers Co. Group · 937 F. Supp. 276
- United States v. Mejia · 376 F. Supp. 2d 460
- Hawthorne Partners v. AT & T TECHNOLOGIES, INC. · 831 F. Supp. 1398
- Noble v. Sheahan · 116 F. Supp. 2d 966
Cited by
Later opinions in our collection that cite this decision.
- United States v. Midyett · 603 F. Supp. 2d 450
- Command Cinema Corp. v. VCA Labs, Inc. · 464 F. Supp. 2d 191
- Opinion · 643 F. Supp. 2d 446
- In Re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether (Mtbe) Products · 643 F. Supp. 2d 482
- Scott v. City of New York · 591 F. Supp. 2d 554
- Carofino v. Forester · 450 F. Supp. 2d 257
- In Re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether Litigation · 643 F. Supp. 2d 461
- Opinion · 644 F. Supp. 2d 310
- United States v. Kozeny · 643 F. Supp. 2d 415
Explore from here
Peter Keeton Leisure’s Judicial Record · S.D. New York · How we source opinions
Source: opinion metadata, authorship, and citation counts from the Free Law Project’s CourtListener bulk data (public domain). Data last verified 2026-07-09. Informational only; verify against the primary source before relying. Not a consumer report (FCRA).