Yield Dynamics, Inc. v. TEA Systems Corp.
Decided September 21, 2007. Conrad L. Rushing wrote the opinion for the court.
66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 1 · Cited 199 times
Official text
Read the full opinion (CourtListener)
We don’t host opinion text or publish a summary of this ruling — read the official public-domain text for the court’s holding and reasoning, and verify against the primary source.
Precedents cited
Decisions in our collection this opinion relies on, ordered by how often it cites each. Cases we publish link through; others open the full text.
- Reynolds Metals Co. v. Alperson · 599 P.2d 83
- Ketchum v. Moses · 17 P.3d 735
- PLCM Group, Inc. v. Drexler · 997 P.2d 511
- Maria P. v. Riles · 743 P.2d 932
- Grisham v. Philip Morris U.S.A., Inc. · 151 P.3d 1151
- Schnabel v. Superior Court · 854 P.2d 1117
- DVD Copy Control Ass'n, Inc. v. Bunner · 75 P.3d 1
- Gemini Aluminum Corp. v. California Custom Shapes, Inc. · 116 Cal. Rptr. 2d 358
- Key v. McCabe · 356 P.2d 169
- Diamond Springs Lime Co. v. American River Constructors · 16 Cal. App. 3d 581
- People v. Watson · 299 P.2d 243
- Grimshaw v. Ford Motor Co. · 119 Cal. App. 3d 757
- HUONG QUE, INC. v. Luu · 58 Cal. Rptr. 3d 527
- Boeken v. Philip Morris Inc. · 26 Cal. Rptr. 3d 638
- City of Lincoln v. Barringer · 126 Cal. Rptr. 2d 178
- Akins v. ENTERPRISE RENT-A-CAR CO. · 94 Cal. Rptr. 2d 448
- Kurinij v. Hanna & Morton · 55 Cal. App. 4th 853
- Exxess Electronixx v. Heger Realty Corp. · 75 Cal. Rptr. 2d 376
- JKH Enterprises, Inc. v. Department of Industrial Relations · 48 Cal. Rptr. 3d 563
- Border Business Park, Inc. v. City of San Diego · 49 Cal. Rptr. 3d 259
- Muzquiz v. City of Emeryville · 94 Cal. Rptr. 2d 579
- Sargent Fletcher, Inc. v. Able Corp. · 3 Cal. Rptr. 3d 279
- Summers v. City of Cathedral City · 225 Cal. App. 3d 1047
- O'GRADY v. Superior Court · 44 Cal. Rptr. 3d 72
- Knight v. City of Capitola · 4 Cal. App. 4th 918
Cited by
Later opinions in our collection that cite this decision.
- Altavion, Inc. v. Konica Minolta System Laboratory, Inc. · 226 Cal. App. 4th 26
- FLIR Systems, Inc. v. Parrish · 174 Cal. App. 4th 1270
- DiQuisto v. County of Santa Clara · 181 Cal. App. 4th 236
- Cypress Semiconductor Corp. v. Maxim Integrated Products, Inc. · 236 Cal. App. 4th 243
- Blickman Turkus v. Mf Downtown Sunnyvale · 76 Cal. Rptr. 3d 325
- Central Valley General Hospital v. Smith · 75 Cal. Rptr. 3d 771
- Chicago Title Insurance v. AMZ Insurance Services, Inc. · 188 Cal. App. 4th 401
- Shopoff & Cavallo LLP v. Hyon · 167 Cal. App. 4th 1489
- Almanor Lakeside Villas Owners Ass'n. v. Carson · 246 Cal. App. 4th 761
- Southern California Gas Co. v. Flannery · 5 Cal. App. 5th 476
- Chalmers v. Hirschkop · 213 Cal. App. 4th 289
- People v. K.F. · 173 Cal. App. 4th 655
- Cytodyn of New Mexico, Inc. v. Amerimmune Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · 72 Cal. Rptr. 3d 600
- Jasmine Networks, Inc. v. Superior Court · 180 Cal. App. 4th 980
- Linton v. Desoto Cab Co. · 223 Cal. Rptr. 3d 761
- J.B.B. Investment Partners, Ltd. v. Fair · 232 Cal. App. 4th 974
- SASCO v. Rosendin Electric, Inc. · 207 Cal. App. 4th 837
- Hartt v. County of Los Angeles · 197 Cal. App. 4th 1391
- Land Partners, LLC v. Cnty. of Orange · 228 Cal. Rptr. 3d 617
- De Lage Landen Operational Services, LLC v. Third Pillar Systems, Inc · 693 F. Supp. 2d 423
- In Re KF · 173 Cal. App. 4th 655
Explore from here
Conrad L. Rushing’s Judicial Record · Cal. Ct. App. · How we source opinions
Source: opinion metadata, authorship, and citation counts from the Free Law Project’s CourtListener bulk data (public domain). Data last verified 2026-07-09. Informational only; verify against the primary source before relying. Not a consumer report (FCRA).