Supreme Court of the United States / October Term 2023

Culley v. Marshall

Decided May 9, 2024. Brett M. Kavanaugh delivered the opinion of the Court.

Docket 22-585 · 601 U.S. 377 · Cited 20 times

Holding

In civil forfeiture cases involving personal property, the Due Process Clause requires a timely forfeiture hearing but does not require a separate preliminary hearing.

The Court’s statement of the holding, from the opinion’s syllabus. The syllabus is prepared by the Reporter of Decisions and is not part of the opinion of the Court — read the official opinion for authority.

Official text

Read the official opinion (PDF, supremecourt.gov) (opens primary source in a new tab)

Explore from here

Brett M. Kavanaugh’s profile · All opinions since October Term 2017 · The Supreme Court

Source: Supreme Court of the United States, slip opinions (2024). Citation count from the Free Law Project’s CourtListener bulk data. Data last verified 2026-07-02. Informational only; verify against the primary source before relying. Not a consumer report (FCRA).