David Conn and Carol Najera v. Paul L. Gabbert
Decided April 5, 1999. William Hubbs Rehnquist delivered the opinion of the Court.
Docket 97-1802 · 526 U.S. 286 (1999) · Cited 836 times
Holding
A named defendant’s time to remove is triggered by simultaneous service of the summons and complaint, or receipt of the complaint, “through service or otherwise,” after and apart from service of the summons, but not by mere receipt of the complaint unattended by any formal service.
The Court’s statement of the holding, from the opinion’s syllabus. The syllabus is prepared by the Reporter of Decisions and is not part of the opinion of the Court — read the official opinion for authority.
How the Justices voted
Decided 9–0.
Majority · 8
Concurring · 1
- John Paul Stevens · filed a concurring opinion
“Concurring” means agreeing with the outcome; any split shown is the Court’s judgment, not each Justice’s reasoning. Source: the Supreme Court Database (Spaeth et al.), Washington University.
Precedents cited
Supreme Court decisions this opinion relies on, ordered by how often it cites each. Cases in our collection link through; others are named.
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth · 408 U.S. 564 (1972)
- Meyer v. Nebraska · 262 U.S. 390 (1923)
- Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners of NM · 353 U.S. 232 (1957)
- Truax v. Raich · 239 U.S. 33 (1915)
- Dent v. West Virginia · 129 U.S. 114 (1889)
- Harlow v. Fitzgerald · 457 U.S. 800 (1982)
- Graham v. Connor · 490 U.S. 386 (1989)
- Warth v. Seldin · 422 U.S. 490 (1975)
- County of Sacramento v. Lewis · 523 U.S. 833 (1998)
- Siegert v. Gilley · 500 U.S. 226 (1991)
- United States v. Mandujano · 425 U.S. 564 (1976)
Cited by
Later Supreme Court opinions in our collection that cite this case.
- Kowalski v. Tesmer · 543 U.S. 125 (2004)
Official text
Read the official opinion (U.S. Reports, govinfo.gov)
Explore from here
William Hubbs Rehnquist’s profile · All Supreme Court opinions · The Supreme Court
Source: Supreme Court of the United States, slip opinions (1999). Citation count from the Free Law Project’s CourtListener bulk data. Data last verified 2026-07-03. Informational only; verify against the primary source before relying. Not a consumer report (FCRA).