Menominee Indian Tribe of Wisconsin v. United States
Decided January 25, 2016. Samuel A. Alito Jr. delivered the opinion of the Court.
Docket 14-510 · 577 U.S. 250 (2016) · Cited 660 times
Holding
Equitable tolling does not apply to the presentment of petitioner's claims.
The Court’s statement of the holding, from the opinion’s syllabus. The syllabus is prepared by the Reporter of Decisions and is not part of the opinion of the Court — read the official opinion for authority.
How the Justices voted
Decided 9–0.
Majority · 9
“Concurring” means agreeing with the outcome; any split shown is the Court’s judgment, not each Justice’s reasoning. Source: the Supreme Court Database (Spaeth et al.), Washington University.
Precedents cited
Supreme Court decisions this opinion relies on, ordered by how often it cites each. Cases in our collection link through; others are named.
- Holland v. Florida · 560 U.S. 631 (2010)
- Pace v. DiGuglielmo · 544 U.S. 408 (2005)
- Lawrence v. Florida · 549 U.S. 327 (2007)
- Baldwin County Welcome Center v. Brown · 466 U.S. 147 (1984)
- Irwin v. Department of Veterans Affairs · 498 U.S. 89 (1990)
- American Pipe & Construction Co. v. Utah · 414 U.S. 538 (1974)
- United States v. Jicarilla Apache Nation · 564 U.S. 162 (2011)
- Cherokee Nation of Okla. v. Leavitt · 543 U.S. 631 (2005)
Cited by
Later Supreme Court opinions in our collection that cite this case.
- Rotkiske v. Klemm · 589 U.S. 8 (2019)
- Yellen v. Confederated Tribes of Chehalis Reservation · 594 U.S. 338 (2021)
Official text
Read the official opinion (U.S. Reports, govinfo.gov)
Explore from here
Samuel A. Alito Jr.’s profile · All Supreme Court opinions · The Supreme Court
Source: Supreme Court of the United States, slip opinions (2016). Citation count from the Free Law Project’s CourtListener bulk data. Data last verified 2026-07-03. Informational only; verify against the primary source before relying. Not a consumer report (FCRA).