Supreme Court of the United States / October Term 2019

Retirement Plans Comm. of IBM v. Jander

Decided January 14, 2020. The Court ruled per curiam, an unsigned opinion of the Court.

Docket 18-1165 · 589 U.S. 49 (2020) · Cited 2 times

Holding

The judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to give the Second Circuit the opportunity to decide whether to entertain the parties’ arguments on ERISA’s duty of prudence.

The Court’s statement of the holding, from the opinion’s syllabus. The syllabus is prepared by the Reporter of Decisions and is not part of the opinion of the Court. Read the official opinion for authority.

Precedents cited

Supreme Court decisions this opinion relies on, ordered by how often it cites each. Cases in our collection link through; others are named.

Cutter v. Wilkinson · 544 U.S. 709 (2005)
Pegram v. Herdrich · 530 U.S. 211 (2000)
Webster v. Fall · 266 U.S. 507 (1925)
Wood v. Milyard · 566 U.S. 463 (2012)
F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. v. Empagran S. A. · 542 U.S. 155 (2004)

Cited by

Later Supreme Court opinions in our collection that cite this case.

Stanley v. City of Sanford · 606 U.S. 46 (2025)

Official text

Read the official opinion (PDF, supremecourt.gov)

Explore from here

All Supreme Court opinions · The Supreme Court

Source: Supreme Court of the United States, slip opinions (2020). Citation count from the Free Law Project’s CourtListener bulk data. Data last verified 2026-08-15. Informational only; verify against the primary source before relying. Not a consumer report (FCRA).