United States v. Stitt
Decided December 10, 2018. Stephen Gerald Breyer delivered the opinion of the Court.
Docket 17-765 · 586 U.S. 27 (2018) · Cited 167 times
Holding
The term “burglary” in the Armed Career Criminal Act includes burglary of a structure or vehicle that has been adapted or is customarily used for overnight accommodation.
The Court’s statement of the holding, from the opinion’s syllabus. The syllabus is prepared by the Reporter of Decisions and is not part of the opinion of the Court. Read the official opinion for authority.
How the Justices voted
Decided 9–0.
Majority · 9
“Concurring” means agreeing with the outcome; any split shown is the Court’s judgment, not each Justice’s reasoning. The lineup is the syllabus’s disposition of who wrote and joined each opinion. Source: the opinion’s syllabus (supremecourt.gov).
Precedents cited
Supreme Court decisions this opinion relies on, ordered by how often it cites each. Cases in our collection link through; others are named.
- Taylor v. United States · 495 U.S. 575 (1990)
- Mathis v. United States · 579 U.S. 500 (2016)
- Cutter v. Wilkinson · 544 U.S. 709 (2005)
- Begay v. United States · 553 U.S. 137 (2008)
- James v. United States · 550 U.S. 192 (2007)
- Johnson v. United States · 576 U.S. 591 (2015)
Cited by
Later Supreme Court opinions in our collection that cite this case.
- Quarles v. United States · 587 U.S. 645 (2019)
Official text
Read the official opinion (PDF, supremecourt.gov)
Explore from here
Stephen Gerald Breyer’s profile · All Supreme Court opinions · The Supreme Court
Source: Supreme Court of the United States, slip opinions (2018). Citation count from the Free Law Project’s CourtListener bulk data. Data last verified 2026-08-15. Informational only; verify against the primary source before relying. Not a consumer report (FCRA).