United States v. Terry J. Hatter, Jr., Judge, United States District Court for the Central District of California, et al.

Decided May 21, 2001. Stephen Gerald Breyer delivered the opinion of the Court.

Docket 99-1978 · 532 U.S. 557 (2001) · Cited 190 times

Holding

Wharf ’s secret intent not to honor the option it sold United violates § 10(b).

The Court’s statement of the holding, from the opinion’s syllabus. The syllabus is prepared by the Reporter of Decisions and is not part of the opinion of the Court — read the official opinion for authority.

How the Justices voted

Decided 5–2.

“Concurring” means agreeing with the outcome; any split shown is the Court’s judgment, not each Justice’s reasoning. Source: the Supreme Court Database (Spaeth et al.), Washington University.

Precedents cited

Supreme Court decisions this opinion relies on, ordered by how often it cites each. Cases in our collection link through; others are named.

• Evans v. Gore · 253 U.S. 245 (1920)
• O'MALLEY v. Woodrough · 307 U.S. 277 (1939)
• United States v. Will · 449 U.S. 200 (1980)
• United States v. Pink · 315 U.S. 203 (1942)
• Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co. · 463 U.S. 29 (1983)
• Quern v. Jordan · 440 U.S. 332 (1979)
• Rodriguez De Quijas v. Shearson/American Express, Inc. · 490 U.S. 477 (1989)

Cited by

Later Supreme Court opinions in our collection that cite this case.

• Kisor v. Wilkie · 588 U.S. 558 (2019)
• Bosse v. Oklahoma · 580 U.S. 1 (2016)
• Roper v. Simmons · 543 U.S. 551 (2005)

Official text

Read the official opinion (U.S. Reports, govinfo.gov)

Explore from here

Stephen Gerald Breyer’s profile · All Supreme Court opinions · The Supreme Court

Source: Supreme Court of the United States, slip opinions (2001). Citation count from the Free Law Project’s CourtListener bulk data. Data last verified 2026-07-03. Informational only; verify against the primary source before relying. Not a consumer report (FCRA).