Ninth Circuit / Appointed 2000 / Senior status since 2021

Richard A. Paez

Judge, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Appointed by President William J. Clinton in 2000 and confirmed by the Senate 5939, Richard A. Paez is a Judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. He earned a law degree from University of California, Berkeley, School of Law in 1972. He previously served on the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. Opinions & record ↓ Sources ↓

Born
1947 · age 79
Appointed by
William J. Clinton, 2000
Confirmed
59–39
Education
Brigham Young 1969 · University of California, Berkeley, Law 1972
Succeeded by
Lucy Haeran Koh

Federal judicial service

YearCourtAppointed byVote
1994Central District of CaliforniaClinton (D)Voice vote
2000Ninth Circuit
succeeded Cecil F. Poole
Clinton (D)59–39

Party letters show the appointing president’s party, not the judge’s own. A voice vote means the chamber approved aloud. No senator-by-senator tally is recorded.

Confirmation vote

Nomination Confirmed 5939 on March 9, 2000 · 106th Congress, Roll Call 40. Each senator links to their judicial-voting record.

Voted to confirm · 59

45 D, 14 R

Voted against · 39

39 R

Did not vote · 2

2 R

Education

Judicial Record

Caseload & case types

In our data, Paez was assigned 1,922 district-court cases (1990–2001). Median time from filing to termination: 195 days across 1,922 closed cases.

Contract19%
Prisoner & habeas18%
Civil rights12%
Intellectual property11%
Labor & ERISA11%
Other federal statutes7%
Other22%

Case assignment is from CourtListener’s PACER-derived docket records: a partial sample, not a complete caseload, reflecting the judge last assigned each case. How we count.

In our data, Paez authored 70 published opinions for the court (1994–2011). Most cited: Silva v. Di Vittorio (504 citations).

Published, precedential opinions from the CourtListener corpus. Counts and rankings are objective and recomputable: how we count. We describe the record, not the judge.

Selected opinions

YearCaseCitationCited
2011Silva v. Di Vittorio658 F.3d 1090504
2010Sapp v. Kimbrell623 F.3d 813498
2008Rosson v. Fitzgerald (In Re Rosson)545 F.3d 764218
1998Isuzu Motors Ltd. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc.12 F. Supp. 2d 1035206
2008Bromfield v. Mukasey543 F.3d 1071127
2010Bateman v. American Multi-Cinema, Inc.623 F.3d 708122
2008Barrett v. Belleque544 F.3d 1060118
2010Johnson v. Rancho Santiago Community College District623 F.3d 1011117
2009Burke v. County of Alameda586 F.3d 72598
2010Perdomo v. Holder611 F.3d 66297
1998Cairns v. Franklin Mint Co.24 F. Supp. 2d 101358
2008Pacific Fisheries, Inc. v. United States539 F.3d 114356
2009United States v. Gonzalez578 F.3d 113046
1995Sentex Systems, Inc. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.882 F. Supp. 93040
2010United States v. Espinoza-Morales621 F.3d 114137

Showing the 15 most-cited of 70 authored opinions in our data. “Cited” is inbound citations across the CourtListener corpus. Case links open the ruling’s full text (CourtListener) or its page here; read the methodology and verify against the primary source.

Questions & answers

Who appointed Richard A. Paez?
President William J. Clinton appointed Richard A. Paez to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in 2000.
Was Richard A. Paez appointed by a Democrat or a Republican?
Richard A. Paez was appointed by President William J. Clinton, a Democrat. JudicialFinder records the appointing president's party, not a judge's own politics.
What was Richard A. Paez's confirmation vote?
The Senate confirmed Richard A. Paez 59–39 on March 9, 2000.
Which court is Richard A. Paez on?
Richard A. Paez is a Judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

Sources

Each fact on this page traces to a primary public record.

How we source & reconcile data → Data & Sources

See something wrong? Report an error. Fixes are logged in the corrections log.

26 years on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Data as of 2026-08-10. Informational only; verify against the primary source before relying. Not a consumer report (FCRA).