City of Los Angeles v. Pomeroy

Decided June 3, 1899. William H. Beatty wrote the opinion for the court.

124 Cal. 597 · Cited 77 times

Authorship attributed by a unique court + date + surname match against our roster (CourtListener recorded no author id for this opinion); verify against the official text. How we match.

Official text

Read the full opinion (CourtListener)

We don’t host opinion text or publish a summary of this ruling — read the official public-domain text for the court’s holding and reasoning, and verify against the primary source.

Precedents cited

Decisions in our collection this opinion relies on, ordered by how often it cites each. Cases we publish link through; others open the full text.

• Gould v. Eaton · 111 Cal. 639
• Southern Pac. R.R. v. Dufour · 95 Cal. 615
• Smith v. Strother · 68 Cal. 194
• Hawley v. Gray Bros. Artificial Stone Paving Co. · 106 Cal. 337

Cited by

Later opinions in our collection that cite this decision.

• North Gualala Water Co. v. State Water Resources Control Board · 43 Cal. Rptr. 3d 821
• City of Los Angeles v. City of San Fernando · 537 P.2d 1251
• San Diego County Water Authority v. Mireiter · 18 Cal. App. 4th 1808
• City of San Diego v. Sloane · 272 Cal. App. 2d 663
• City of Los Angeles v. Hunter · 105 P. 755
• City of L.A. v. L.A. Farming & Milling Co. · 152 Cal. 645
• City of Los Angeles v. City of Glendale · 23 Cal. 2d 68
• Los Angeles v. Los Angeles Etc. Co. · 93 P. 869
• Beaulieu Vineyard v. Superior Court · 91 P. 1015
• Maricopa County Municipal Water Conservation District Number One v. Southwest Cotton Co. · 4 P.2d 369
• McClintock v. Hudson · 74 P. 849
• Katz v. Walkinshaw · 70 P. 663
• Tulare Irrigation District v. Lindsay-Strathmore Irrigation District · 3 Cal. 2d 489
• City of San Bernardino v. City of Riverside · 198 P. 784
• Verdugo Ca&209on Water Co. v. Verdugo · 93 P. 1021
• Collier v. Merced Irrigation District · 2 P.2d 790
• Mott v. Horstmann · 36 Cal. 2d 388
• City of San Diego v. Cuyamaca Water Co. · 287 P. 475
• Fellows v. City of Los Angeles · 90 P. 137
• In Re the General Adjudication of All Rights to Use Water in the Gila River System & Source · 9 P.3d 1069
• Tyson Creek Railroad v. Empire Mill Co. · 31 Idaho 580
• Sacramento Municipal Utility District v. Gas & Electric Co. · 72 Cal. App. 2d 638
• Huffner v. Sawday · 94 P. 424
• Washington v. Oregon · 297 U.S. 517
• Marin Mun. Water Dist. v. Marin Water & Power Co. · 173 P. 469

Explore from here

William H. Beatty’s Judicial Record · Cal. · How we source opinions

Source: opinion metadata, authorship, and citation counts from the Free Law Project’s CourtListener bulk data (public domain). Data last verified 2026-07-09. Informational only; verify against the primary source before relying. Not a consumer report (FCRA).