Tulare Irrigation District v. Lindsay-Strathmore Irrigation District
Decided May 3, 1935. William H. Waste wrote the opinion for the court.
3 Cal. 2d 489 · Cited 150 times
Official text
Read the full opinion (CourtListener)
We don’t host opinion text or publish a summary of this ruling — read the official public-domain text for the court’s holding and reasoning, and verify against the primary source.
Precedents cited
Decisions in our collection this opinion relies on, ordered by how often it cites each. Cases we publish link through; others open the full text.
- Katz v. Walkinshaw · 70 P. 663
- Fall River Valley Irrigation District v. Mt. Shasta Power Corp. · 259 P. 444
- Newport v. Temescal Water Co. · 87 P. 372
- American Steel Foundries v. Tri-City Central Trades Council · 257 U.S. 184
- Peabody v. City of Vallejo · 2 Cal. 2d 351
- Herminghaus v. Southern California Edison Co. · 252 P. 607
- Pabst v. Finmand · 211 P. 11
- Tulare Irrigation District v. Superior Court · 242 P. 725
- Burr v. MacLay Rancho Water Co. · 98 P. 260
- California Pastoral & Agriculture Co. v. Madera Canal & Irrigation Co. · 138 P. 718
- Northern California Power Co. v. Flood · 199 P. 315
- Turner v. East Side Canal & Irrigation Co. · 147 P. 579
- Eden Township Water District v. City of Hayward · 24 P.2d 492
- Stinson Canal & Irrigation Co. v. Lemoore Canal & Irrigation Co. · 188 P. 77
- Duplex Printing Press Co. v. Deering · 254 U.S. 443
- Hudson County Water Co. v. McCarter · 209 U.S. 349
- United States v. Rio Grande Dam & Irrigation Co. · 174 U.S. 690
- Connecticut v. Massachusetts · 282 U.S. 660
- Texas Co. v. Brown · 258 U.S. 466
- Conaway v. Yolo Water & Power Co. · 266 P. 944
- Gin S. Chow v. City of Santa Barbara · 22 P.2d 5
- Miller & Lux v. Madera Canal & Irrigation Co. · 99 P. 502
- Lindsay-Strathmore Irrigation Dist. v. Superior Court of Tulare Cty. · 187 P. 1056
- Gurnsey v. Northern California Power Co. · 117 P. 906
- City of Los Angeles v. Pomeroy · 124 Cal. 597
Cited by
Later opinions in our collection that cite this decision.
- Rank v. (Krug) United States · 142 F. Supp. 1
- In Re Waters of Long Valley Creek Stream System · 599 P.2d 656
- Rowland v. Ramelli · 25 Cal. 3d 339
- Delta Canal Co. v. Frank Vincent Family Ranch, LC · 2013 UT 69
- Santa Barbara Channelkeeper v. City of San Buenaventura · 228 Cal. Rptr. 3d 584
- City of Pasadena v. City of Alhambra · 33 Cal. 2d 908
- Rank v. Krug · 90 F. Supp. 773
- McDonald v. State · 722 P.2d 598
- Allen v. California Water & Telephone Co. · 29 Cal. 2d 466
- Joslin v. Marin Municipal Water District · 429 P.2d 889
- City of Lodi v. East Bay Municipal Utility District · 7 Cal. 2d 316
- Pleasant Valley Canal Co. v. Borror · 61 Cal. App. 4th 742
- City of Los Angeles v. City of San Fernando · 537 P.2d 1251
- City of Barstow v. Mojave Water Agency · 5 P.3d 853
- Bank of Idaho v. Pine Avenue Associates · 137 Cal. App. 3d 5
- California Trout, Inc. v. State Water Resources Control Board · 207 Cal. App. 3d 585
- State, Dept. of Parks v. IDAHO DEPT, WATER ADMIN. · 530 P.2d 924
- Department of Ecology v. Grimes · 852 P.2d 1044
- United States v. Fallbrook Public Utility District · 165 F. Supp. 806
- United States v. Fallbrook Public Utility Dist. · 108 F. Supp. 72
- United States v. 4.105 ACRES OF LAND, ETC. · 68 F. Supp. 279
- In Re Waters of Soquel Creek Stream System · 79 Cal. App. 3d 682
- City of Capitola v. CHY Co. · 79 Cal. App. 3d 682
- People v. Shirokow · 605 P.2d 859
- City of Los Angeles v. City of Glendale · 23 Cal. 2d 68
Explore from here
William H. Waste’s Judicial Record · Cal. · How we source opinions
Source: opinion metadata, authorship, and citation counts from the Free Law Project’s CourtListener bulk data (public domain). Data last verified 2026-07-09. Informational only; verify against the primary source before relying. Not a consumer report (FCRA).