In Re: C.M.K., Appeal of: CYS

Decided January 24, 2019. Mary Janes Bowes wrote the opinion for the court.

203 A.3d 258 · Cited 171 times

Authorship attributed by a unique court + date + surname match against our roster (CourtListener recorded no author id for this opinion); verify against the official text. How we match.

Official text

Read the full opinion (CourtListener)

We don’t host opinion text or publish a summary of this ruling — read the official public-domain text for the court’s holding and reasoning, and verify against the primary source.

Precedents cited

Decisions in our collection this opinion relies on, ordered by how often it cites each. Cases we publish link through; others open the full text.

• In re T.S.M. · 71 A.3d 251
• In re L.M. · 923 A.2d 505
• In Re Adoption of R.J.S. · 901 A.2d 502
• In the Interest of A.S. · 11 A.3d 473
• In the Interest of: C.K., A Minor Appeal of: CYF · 165 A.3d 935

Cited by

Later opinions in our collection that cite this decision.

• In Re: J.M., Appeal of: J.R., Mother
• In Re: J.M., a Minor
• In the Int. of: K.R.I., Appeal of: K.P.
• In the Int. of: H.S.G., Appeal of: J.G.
• In the Int. of: K.L.B., a Minor
• Term. of Par. Rights to L.J.B., Minor
• In the Int. of: C.A.H., III
• In Re: K.S., Appeal of: K.S., Sr.

Explore from here

Mary Janes Bowes’s Judicial Record · Pa. Super. Ct. · How we source opinions

Source: opinion metadata, authorship, and citation counts from the Free Law Project’s CourtListener bulk data (public domain). Data last verified 2026-07-09. Informational only; verify against the primary source before relying. Not a consumer report (FCRA).