State Court of Appeals / Colo. Ct. App.

In Re the Marriage of Garst

Decided March 19, 1998. Claus J. Hume wrote the opinion for the court.

955 P.2d 1056 · Cited 302 times

Official text

We don’t host opinion text or publish a summary of this ruling — read the official public-domain text for the court’s holding and reasoning, and verify against the primary source.

Precedents cited

Decisions in our collection this opinion relies on, ordered by how often it cites each. Cases we publish link through; others open the full text.

In Re the Marriage of Francis · 919 P.2d 776
In Re Marriage of Jaramillo · 543 P.2d 1281
In Re the Marriage of Elmer · 936 P.2d 617
In Re the Marriage of Chester · 907 P.2d 726
In Re the Marriage of Murphy · 834 P.2d 1287
Regional Transportation District v. Jackson · 805 P.2d 1190

Cited by

Later opinions in our collection that cite this decision.

In Re the Marriage of Martin · 42 P.3d 75
In Re the Marriage of Ciesluk · 100 P.3d 527
In re the Marriage of Graham · 121 P.3d 279
People ex rel. A.M.K. · 68 P.3d 563
In Re the Marriage of McNamara · 962 P.2d 330
In re the Marriage of Goodbinder · 119 P.3d 584
Marriage of DeZalia v. DeZalia · 151 P.3d 647
In Re the Custody of C.M. · 74 P.3d 342
In re the Marriage of Ohr · 97 P.3d 354
In Re Marriage, Kniskern v. Kniskern · 80 P.3d 939
People Ex Rel. Amk · 68 P.3d 563

Explore from here

Claus J. Hume’s Judicial Record · Colo. Ct. App. · How we source opinions

Source: opinion metadata, authorship, and citation counts from the Free Law Project’s CourtListener bulk data (public domain). Data last verified 2026-07-09. Informational only; verify against the primary source before relying. Not a consumer report (FCRA).