State Court of Appeals / Colo. Ct. App.

In Re the Marriage of Martin

Decided January 3, 2002. Daniel Marc Taubman wrote the opinion for the court.

42 P.3d 75 · Cited 871 times

Official text

We don’t host opinion text or publish a summary of this ruling — read the official public-domain text for the court’s holding and reasoning, and verify against the primary source.

Precedents cited

Decisions in our collection this opinion relies on, ordered by how often it cites each. Cases we publish link through; others open the full text.

In Re the Marriage of Bregar · 952 P.2d 783
In Re the Marriage of Garst · 955 P.2d 1056
Adoption of Michelle · 44 Cal. App. 3d 699
Paternity of Cheryl · 434 Mass. 23
Aylor v. Aylor · 478 P.2d 302
Evans v. Evans · 569 P.2d 244
In Matter of Z · 260 N.W.2d 246
Crites v. Crites · 137 Colo. 220
In Re the Marriage of Elmer · 936 P.2d 617
In the Interest of D.R.V-A. v. C.V. · 976 P.2d 881
In Re the Marriage of Lester · 791 P.2d 1244
C.R.S. v. T.A.M. · 892 P.2d 246
In Re the Marriage of Meisner · 715 P.2d 1273
Newman v. Newman · 653 P.2d 728
In Re the Marriage of Lee · 781 P.2d 102
In Re the Marriage of McCord · 910 P.2d 85
In Re the Marriage of Zisch · 967 P.2d 199
K.R. v. B.M.H. · 982 P.2d 521
In the Interest of G.C. · 50 S.W.3d 408
In Re the Marriage of Chester · 907 P.2d 726
Elizabeth A. S. v. Anthony M. S. · 435 A.2d 721

Cited by

Later opinions in our collection that cite this decision.

In the Interest of E.L.M.C. · 100 P.3d 546
In Re ELMC · 100 P.3d 546
In Re the Marriage of Hatton · 160 P.3d 326
In Re Marriage of Connerton and Nevin · 260 P.3d 62
People ex rel. A.M.K. · 68 P.3d 563
People ex rel. C.M. · 116 P.3d 1278
In Re the Marriage of Atencio · 47 P.3d 718
In the Interest of C.T.G. · 179 P.3d 213
In Re the Marriage of Bertsch · 97 P.3d 219
In Re the Marriage of Campbell · 140 P.3d 320
In Re Marriage, Kniskern v. Kniskern · 80 P.3d 939
People Ex Rel. Cm · 116 P.3d 1278
People Ex Rel. Amk · 68 P.3d 563
In Re CTG · 179 P.3d 213

Explore from here

Daniel Marc Taubman’s Judicial Record · Colo. Ct. App. · How we source opinions

Source: opinion metadata, authorship, and citation counts from the Free Law Project’s CourtListener bulk data (public domain). Data last verified 2026-07-09. Informational only; verify against the primary source before relying. Not a consumer report (FCRA).