Manrique v. United States

Decided April 19, 2017. Clarence Thomas delivered the opinion of the Court.

Docket 15-7250 · 581 U.S. 116 (2017) · Cited 139 times

Holding

A defendant wishing to appeal an order imposing restitution in a deferred restitution case must file a notice of appeal from that order.

The Court’s statement of the holding, from the opinion’s syllabus. The syllabus is prepared by the Reporter of Decisions and is not part of the opinion of the Court — read the official opinion for authority.

How the Justices voted

Decided 6–2.

“Concurring” means agreeing with the outcome; any split shown is the Court’s judgment, not each Justice’s reasoning. Source: the Supreme Court Database (Spaeth et al.), Washington University.

Precedents cited

Supreme Court decisions this opinion relies on, ordered by how often it cites each. Cases in our collection link through; others are named.

• Eberhart v. United States · 546 U.S. 12 (2005)
• Dolan v. United States · 560 U.S. 605 (2010)
• Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co. · 459 U.S. 56 (1982)
• Henderson v. Shinseki · 562 U.S. 428 (2011)
• Bowles v. Russell · 551 U.S. 205 (2007)
• Gonzalez v. Thaler · 565 U.S. 134 (2012)
• Kontrick v. Ryan · 540 U.S. 443 (2004)
• United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co. · 200 U.S. 321 (1906)
• United States v. Ruiz · 536 U.S. 622 (2002)
• Greenlaw v. United States · 554 U.S. 237 (2008)
• Scarborough v. Principi · 541 U.S. 401 (2004)
• Firstier Mortgage Co. v. Investors Mortgage Insurance · 498 U.S. 269 (1991)
• Corey v. United States · 375 U.S. 169 (1963)

Explore from here

Clarence Thomas’s profile · All Supreme Court opinions · The Supreme Court

Source: Supreme Court of the United States, slip opinions (2017). Citation count from the Free Law Project’s CourtListener bulk data. Data last verified 2026-07-03. Informational only; verify against the primary source before relying. Not a consumer report (FCRA).