Reginald a. Wilkinson, Director, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction, et al. v. Charles E. Austin et al.

Decided June 13, 2005. Anthony McLeod Kennedy delivered the opinion of the Court.

Docket 04-495 · 545 U.S. 209 (2005) · Cited 2,479 times

Holding

The procedures by which Ohio’s New Policy classifies prisoners for placement at its Supermax facility provide prisoners with sufficient protection to comply with the Due Process Clause.

The Court’s statement of the holding, from the opinion’s syllabus. The syllabus is prepared by the Reporter of Decisions and is not part of the opinion of the Court — read the official opinion for authority.

How the Justices voted

Decided 9–0.

“Concurring” means agreeing with the outcome; any split shown is the Court’s judgment, not each Justice’s reasoning. Source: the Supreme Court Database (Spaeth et al.), Washington University.

Precedents cited

Supreme Court decisions this opinion relies on, ordered by how often it cites each. Cases in our collection link through; others are named.

• Sandin v. Conner · 515 U.S. 472 (1995)
• Mathews v. Eldridge · 424 U.S. 319 (1976)
• Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional Complex · 442 U.S. 1 (1979)
• Hewitt v. Helms · 459 U.S. 460 (1983)
• Wolff v. McDonnell · 418 U.S. 539 (1974)
• Morrissey v. Brewer · 408 U.S. 471 (1972)
• Meachum v. Fano · 427 U.S. 215 (1976)
• Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill · 470 U.S. 532 (1985)
• Gerstein v. Pugh · 420 U.S. 103 (1975)
• Fuentes v. Shevin · 407 U.S. 67 (1972)
• Vitek v. Jones · 445 U.S. 480 (1980)
• Baldwin v. Hale · 68 U.S. 223 (1864)

Cited by

Later Supreme Court opinions in our collection that cite this case.

• Kerry v. Din · 576 U.S. 86 (2015)
• Davis v. Ayala · 576 U.S. 257 (2015)
• District Attorney's Office for the Third Judicial District v. Osborne · 557 U.S. 52 (2009)
• United States v. Grubbs · 547 U.S. 90 (2006)

Official text

Read the official opinion (U.S. Reports, govinfo.gov)

Explore from here

Anthony McLeod Kennedy’s profile · All Supreme Court opinions · The Supreme Court

Source: Supreme Court of the United States, slip opinions (2005). Citation count from the Free Law Project’s CourtListener bulk data. Data last verified 2026-07-03. Informational only; verify against the primary source before relying. Not a consumer report (FCRA).